Ok, don't want to give away all the details, but there is a magic sword (+3) in RoUIII that has a chance of destroying magical barriers. In the original writing, it has a percentage chance equal to its damage (rolled plus bonus) to destroy a magical barrier. Here's an example:
User rolls a 7 on 1d8, the sword has a +3 bonus, so that's a 10% chance (7+3) to destroy the wall of force the user was trying to bring down.
I'm not sure if I should double that. The average roll on d8 is 4 or 5, plus the +3 bonus (it's a +3 sword), so the average percentage chance is around 7% to 8% - not that great. Even rolling max damage gives it a mere 11% chance. Doubling that would result in an average of 14% to 18% and a max possibility of 22%.
Who here thinks the latter is better (ie doubling the percentage chance)?
What do the rest of you think of this magic item?
Moderator: Thorn Blackstone
- Halaster Blackcloak
- Lord of Undermountain
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:47 am
- Location: Undermountain
- Contact:
What do the rest of you think of this magic item?
The Back In Print Project - Where AD&D Lives Forever!
-
- Citizen of Undermountain
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 1:30 am
- Location: North Idaho
I would say it depends on how effective and what types of magical barriers you want it to work on. Does it only work on "wall" spells such as wall of force, wall of stone or wal of fire? or does it go so far as prismatic wall, prismatic sphere? Perhaps there should be a limit on the level of magic it can effect. If its effecting say level 4 and under spells, double the chance, level 5-7 have the normal chance and above level 7 it does not efect. I would say that would still be a very powerful magical item to have.
Having used a similar sword in the past, the way we worked it didn't have percentages, but the sword would slice the barriers. Not destroy them. So you had to cut a hole big enough for your purposes. (minimum 3 rounds to get through a barrier if you used a triangular cut)
The sword we had was +5, so it could make a 5' straight line slice in one round. There wasn't any others, but the idea was that a +3 version would cut 3' slices. (multiple attacks don't help for this)
We didn't have anything in place for higher level spells or casters, but I could see something that would reduce the amount you could cut.
An alternative might be to give the barriers a certain amount of hit points and have the wielder do that amount of damage. I think that was how the vorpal sword vs rock worked in 1E. (it wasn't JUST for lopping off heads then)
Mira (When you're out of whack, it's time to order more whack!)
The sword we had was +5, so it could make a 5' straight line slice in one round. There wasn't any others, but the idea was that a +3 version would cut 3' slices. (multiple attacks don't help for this)
We didn't have anything in place for higher level spells or casters, but I could see something that would reduce the amount you could cut.
An alternative might be to give the barriers a certain amount of hit points and have the wielder do that amount of damage. I think that was how the vorpal sword vs rock worked in 1E. (it wasn't JUST for lopping off heads then)
Mira (When you're out of whack, it's time to order more whack!)
- Halaster Blackcloak
- Lord of Undermountain
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:47 am
- Location: Undermountain
- Contact: